All throughout high school I was told "the more words the better" when writing an essay for a class. Although this never made since to me because I felt that my papers as well as my peers, drug on and on, just to meet the couple of thousand word quota for the assigned paper, of course I listened to receive a good grade. With that being said, high school is to prepare you for college, correct? Wrong! Now that I get to college, fewer words arn't "better" to say, but less is more in a since in chapter ninteen that I read titled "writing with style". Apparently the "filler" words I used in high school such as: at all times, in order to, should now be simplified to always and to.
I do understand where my high school was going when they wanted more words, which would of been to make sure we are capable to writing a lengthy paper to grade us on grammer and other aspects of a paper, why do they consider it "preparing for college" if the day I get here, writing styles change..
Friday, October 18, 2013
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Overweight
As I logged onto my computer today to do my usual morning aol.com look-around, I seen a news article where a school, upset a childs mother. At first, I thought to myself, oh great! Another angry mother over nothing kind of story, but I figured why not read more into it. To my surprise, she had every right to be furious at the school! The Flordia school sent a letter home with an 11 year old girl, stating that she is "overweight". Since when are schools health physicians? They should be focused on learning, and only learning. Allowing an 11 year old girl to read a note the school wrote stating she is overweight could cause the girl to have self-esteem issues.
I do not fully disagree with schools doing health check-ups on students (if the parents are fully aware), but until a certain age, results to any health related problems should be given directly to parents, not to an 11 year old girl that is able to read that the school is calling her over-weight.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/08/kristin-grasso-florida-school-letter-overweight_n_4058460.html?1381260343&icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl7|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D388540
I do not fully disagree with schools doing health check-ups on students (if the parents are fully aware), but until a certain age, results to any health related problems should be given directly to parents, not to an 11 year old girl that is able to read that the school is calling her over-weight.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/08/kristin-grasso-florida-school-letter-overweight_n_4058460.html?1381260343&icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl7|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D388540
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Race
In an article I read, "Race and the White Coat" by Rahul K. Parikh, he states that minorities, specifically African Americans, are not as healthy as whites. He say's they are known for higher rates of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, HIV, cancer, asthma, and other chronic illnesses. He then tell's us that doctors do stereotype other minorities, which I think is fair! Some people are upset by this, but it is not racism. Minorities are known to not take medical treatments as serious as whites. They are more likely to ignore what the doctor tells them, such as not taking the prescribed medicine. If I were a doctor, and I had a patient continuously coming in for the same issues, just to find out he is not taking his medicine, I would begin to stop prescribing him. In the same sense, I would also be less likely to give him a kidney transplant over someone else, who has been cooperative with me. So being biased against minorities is not a problem, as these show in studies to be true in many cases.
Monday, September 23, 2013
Iphone 5s
As a big Apple fan, the release of the new Iphone 5s was a big excitement to me. To go back a few years, my first Iphone was the 4, and overall, it was a great phone. Always in a case, it was dropped multiple times a week, and owning the phone for 2 years, no screen was cracked, nor did any other problems arise. When I was due for an upgrade, I got the Iphone 5, which has been a decent phone, with multiple problems. The phone won't charge 70% of the time! It also liked to freeze up "under load", such as listening to music and surfing the web for a long period of time. Now back to today, as I have been debating on just upgrading to the 5s, I get on AOL.com and in the news headlines I read "
Iphone 5s More Fragile Than iphone 5, Tests Find". My only words are "What is wrong with this company" It seems as though every iphone has done nothing but get cheaper and cheaper as the years go on. If I am paying $200.00 for a new iphone, I expect it to last, not stop charging, freeze up, and with one light drop, shatter a screen. I feel as though apple will begin to loose business over time from those who also realize their products seem to be made cheaper then before.
Iphone 5s More Fragile Than iphone 5, Tests Find". My only words are "What is wrong with this company" It seems as though every iphone has done nothing but get cheaper and cheaper as the years go on. If I am paying $200.00 for a new iphone, I expect it to last, not stop charging, freeze up, and with one light drop, shatter a screen. I feel as though apple will begin to loose business over time from those who also realize their products seem to be made cheaper then before.
Monday, September 16, 2013
Silence of cellphones
In the article "Devices Enforce Silence of Cellphones, Illegally" written by Matt Richtel, we are told that there are devices that are on the market, illegally, that allow you to temporary disable any cellphone within so much distance of you. All though this seems cool, and would be funny to play a prank on your friends. And like Matt tells us in the article, they are used by employers to disable their employees cell phones while at work, or even by teacher to stop students from being distracted. Which all seem like good reasons to use one, except for in emergency situations. Which is why I feel they should remain illegal. Just think, your at work and get hurt, and when you try to use your phone, its disabled because your boss thought it would be a good idea to disable it. These jammer's seem to have a couple positive sides to them, but those are easily over thrown by the con of not being able to use your phone if you needed to in an emergency situation. In the article, Matt also tells us that people are buying these jammer's online. Being illegal in the U.S., they must be coming from other countries, but why are we not stopping this. Sure, the government is not able to inspect every package that comes into the U.S., but why don't they purchase one themselves just to get the address of the sender, and from there ban any packages from that address coming into the U.S?
Monday, September 9, 2013
Zimmerman
George
Zimmerman, in my eyes, is a threat waiting to happen. First of all, he was charged back in February
of 2012 for the murder of Trayvon Martin.
Between that date and the day his trial began, June 10th,
2013, he was stopped twice for speeding, and on one traffic stop, he had a gun
in his possession. What is the state of Florida
thinking, allowing him to have a gun after being charged for a murder involving
a gun? The first step should have been
to take any type of weapon away from him to prevent such case from happening
again. On July 13th, 2013, he
was found not guilty, and released of all charges against him. Now, only months later, he was arrested for a
domestic violence against his wife, Shellie, and her father. This is the second incident in only a year
with George, and not only that, he threatened his wife and father with a gun. After
being arrested, his wife agreed to not press charges but why wouldn’t the state
forcefully take away any weapons from this man.
He clearly has a history of using weapons, and now he’s pulling them on
others? Do we have to wait for him to
commit another murder before we decide to take action? His gun privileges should be revoked,
immediately!
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/09/us/george-zimmerman-detained/
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Social networking
In the article “Is Social
Networking a Waste of Time” written by Bernhard Warner, he shows up multiple
pros and cons of social networking. Only
telling us a couple of cons such as: 6.5 billion dollars of revenue lost in the
British industry because of time spent on sites such as Facebook and Myspace,
and students in school spending as much time as 30 minutes per day on these
sites instead of listening to their instructor.
As for pros, he tells us that his former students have used these sites
for good things including to promote their online newspaper, build and promote
projects on fighting poverty, organizing music gigs, and coordinating meet ups
for political rallies. Although I also
believe these are good reasons that social networking is not a waste of time, I
disagree with Bernhard Warner because I feel the cons out weigh the pros he
listed to support social networking to not be a waste of time.
The reason I
feel that his cons make social networking feel like a waste of time is because
if a company is losing 6.5 billion dollars due to their employees focusing more
on Facebook then getting things done, this is causing products such as cell
phones, computers, and even food products to increase in price due to the
companies losing money. He also says
students spend as much as 30 or more minutes on these websites during
school. The amount of information they
are losing, such as important due dates of a paper that they may not have heard
was due because they were posting a status could result in failing a
class. To add to his cons list, kids
today are not the same kids as they were 30 years ago before social networking
was around. Kids now don’t want to leave
the house. Countless amounts of times
have I listened to my sister say “I’m bored”, when she has every possible
gaming system, ipods, TV channel, cell phone, and access to any website,
including Facebook. I feel that in my parent’s
day, they never complained. They would
go outside and make their own games.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)